Journal of Health and Caring Sciences https://journalofhealthandcaringsciences.org/index.php/jhcs <h3 style="text-align: justify;">Focus and Scope</h3> <p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>Journal of Health and Caring Sciences (JHCS)</strong> is an OPEN-ACCESS, international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, official health and caring science publication of the San Beda University. Founded by the College of Nursing and the College of Medicine in 2018, it is published bi-annually both in print and online. It welcomes submission in various formats, including but not limited to original completed research studies, systematic reviews, case studies, book reviews, commentaries, letter to the editor and innovative research proposals which explores timely and emerging topics on human health, wellness, and caring science.</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>THE JHCS DOES NOT CHARGE ANY ARTICLE PROCESSING FEES.&nbsp;</strong></p> <p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p> <h3 style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Peer Review Process</strong></h3> <p style="text-align: justify;">Once the article has been submitted, initial screening will be done by the Secretariat to determine if all the required documents were submitted and if it conforms to the scope and citation style of the journal. If the submitted article passes the initial screening, it will be forwarded for peer review. The JHCS strictly followed a double-blind peer review process in evaluating the suitability of the article for publication.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p> <h3 style="text-align: justify;">Publication Frequency</h3> <p style="text-align: justify;">The articles submitted in JHCS will be published on this website once the review, copyediting, and approval of the galley proofs are completed. The articles are compiled at the end of May and November and are published in print and online as an issue.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</p> <h3 style="text-align: justify;">Open Access Policy</h3> <p style="text-align: justify;">This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge</p> San Beda University en-US Journal of Health and Caring Sciences 2672-3832 Reflections on Nursing Discipline, Profession, and Education https://journalofhealthandcaringsciences.org/index.php/jhcs/article/view/88 <p>This editorial explores the nature of nursing as a discipline and profession and how these are expressed in the transfer of nursing knowledge thru education. It further emphasized that nursing knowledge must take precedence over ancillary knowledge as the focal point and essence of its curriculum in educating future nurses.</p> Rudolf Cymorr Kirby Martinez Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Health and Caring Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2021-12-18 2021-12-18 3 2 82 84 10.37719/jhcs.2021.v3i2.e001 The Presence of Cataract Does Not Influence Assessment of The Pupillary Light Reflex Using Automated Pupillometry https://journalofhealthandcaringsciences.org/index.php/jhcs/article/view/67 <p><strong>Background</strong>: Advanced Pupillary Light Reflex (PLR) assessment with an automated infrared pupillometer (AIP) is becoming standard. Although cataract prevalence and risk for neurologic illness both increase with age there is no literature on the influence of cataract when assessing PLR using AIP.</p> <p><strong>Objective:</strong> Our aim is to explore the effect of cataract on pupillary response to light.</p> <p><strong>Methods and Materials</strong>: Mixed model analyses were performed by enrolling 3,650 patients with PLR readings from AIP. &nbsp;The Neurological Pupil Index (NPi), and each component of the PLR was examined separately.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>3,207 patients did not have cataract, 59 had unilateral, and 271 bilateral cataract. Generalized linear mixed effect model of 87,290 right eye, and 76,587 left eye AIP measurements found no effect of cataract on any PLR measures: NPi (p=0.221 and p=0.655); latency (p=0.483 and p=0.865); initial pupil size (p=0.661 and 0.712); minimum pupil size (p=0.708 and p=0.720); constriction velocity (p=0.646 and 0.347); nor dilation velocity (p=0.716 and 0.194) for the right and left eye groups respectively. Paired t-test found no difference in NPi (p=0.146). Among those with unilateral cataract (n=59).</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:&nbsp; </strong>The presence of cataract does not alter the PLR findings assessed with a pupillometer.</p> Sonja Stutzman DaiWai Olson Aardhra Venkatachalam Arianna Barnes Folefac Atem Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Health and Caring Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2021-12-18 2021-12-18 3 2 85 95 10.37719/jhcs.2021.v3i2.oa001 Assessment of Perceived Social Support, Quality of Life and Resilience among Pregnant Women in Northern Nigeria https://journalofhealthandcaringsciences.org/index.php/jhcs/article/view/70 <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy causes inevitably significant psychological and physiological impacts on woman. It causes high emotional changes and occasionally mental disturbances. These make pregnancy a period of life that requires woman to have bio-psycho-social adjustments through good social support, quality of life and resilience.&nbsp;&nbsp; <strong>&nbsp;</strong>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Aim</strong>: This study was aimed at assessing the Perceived Social Support, Quality of Life and Resilience among pregnant women in northern Nigeria.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong>: The study was descriptive and adopted cross sectional design. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, short Form (SF-36) Health Survey 1.0 Questionnaire, and Connor-Davidson RS Scale were used for data collection. Respondents were selected using systematic sampling. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26 and Kruskal-wallis test was used for inferential analysis.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong>: Majority of the respondents had good and very-good perceived social support (23.1% and 27.2%) respectively. Majority of the respondents (76.6%) had poor quality of life. Majority of the respondents had good and very-good resilience (28.6% and 40.3%) respectively. P&lt;0.001 in perceived social support differences by age, parity, educational level, and family economic status, respectively. P&lt;0.05, P&lt;0.01 and P&lt;0.01 in quality of life differences by age, parity, and family economic status respectively. P&lt;0.05, P&lt;0.01 and P&lt;0.01 in resilience differences by age, parity, and level of education, respectively.</p> <p><strong>&nbsp;Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare workers especially midwives should consider pregnant women’s perceived social support, quality of life and resilience when rendering their services.</p> <p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p> <p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Midwives, Pregnancy, Quality of life, Resilience, Social support</p> Yahaya Jafaru Muhammed Murtala Musa Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Health and Caring Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2022-12-10 2022-12-10 3 2 96 109 10.37719/jhcs.2021.v3i2.oa002 Establishing a Pathway to Define Nursing Informatics Practice: Defining a Clear Scope of the Specialty Practice https://journalofhealthandcaringsciences.org/index.php/jhcs/article/view/83 <p>Informatics Nurse Practice needs to be clearly delineated and presented to the Nursing Community and relevant stakeholders in the Allied Health Profession. With the advent of the COVID-19, the Digital Economy has moved innovations in healthcare with great speed, breadth, and depth. The emergence of data scientists practicing in healthcare, together with data analysts and data scientists, blur the line between the practice demarcations between professions. It is imperative to clearly define the scope of Informatics Nurse and Informatics Nurse Specialist Practice through existing definitions of Nursing informatics Practice by International and National Organizations advocating for its advancement. This paper aims to present a clear flowchart that any practitioner can use to clearly define whether their practice in a healthcare setting with nurses involved can be considered as Informatics Nurse or Informatics Nurse Specialist practice.</p> John Francis Faustorilla Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Health and Caring Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 2022-12-10 2022-12-10 3 2 10.37719/jhcs.202.v3i2.rna001